Thursday, May 26, 2016

Katie Couric Gun Documentary Deceptively Edited

Gun Control
Oleg Volk

HT: Ferealirsihman

This just shows that the disarmament agenda are not merely misguided morons. If they were misguided morons, they would believe their own bullshit and would not have felt the need to edit it.

From: Freebeacon

The makers of a new Katie Couric documentary on gun violence deceptively edited an interview between Couric and a group of gun rights activists in an apparent attempt to embarrass the activists, an audio recording of the full interview shows.
At the 21:48 mark of Under the Gun a scene of Katie Couric interviewing members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, a gun rights organization, is shown.
Couric can be heard in the interview asking activists from the group, “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?”
The documentary then shows the activists sitting silently for nine awkward seconds, unable to provide an answer. It then cuts to the next scene. The moment can be watched here:
However, raw audio of the interview between Katie Couric and the activists provided to the Washington Free Beacon shows the scene was deceptively edited. Instead of silence, Couric’s question is met immediately with answers from the activists. A back and forth between a number of the league’s members and Couric over the issue of background checks proceeds for more than four minutes after the original question is asked.


  1. We can't really be surprised, the gun control lobby's entire argument is based upon myth, fallacy and manufactured lies. Episodes such as this, illustrate why their losing the battle, and shows the lengths that they're willing to sell their integrity.

    1. That is the advantage we the people have now. They think we are stupid.

  2. I've commented on the deception on other blogs and also asked 2 questions; 1) what was the goal (it sure was NOT objective in any way). 2) who funded it? Katie needs to own up to this propaganda piece.

    1. As far as this "docoumentary" goes, to make gun owners look stupid. It is a battle of perceptions and while the oligarchy thinks they are winning, they are in fact losing.

      I am not sure who funded it, but it has to be one of the usual rich and hypocritical progressive members of the donor class.

  3. Here's a list of the people involved

    Further research might uncover others or who backed its development.